The above warning was given to me when I first met Orthodoxy in 1986. Today [2009] it is even more perilous, even more difficult to find the Royal Path. For one thing there is a far greater abundance of misinformation. And many materials are missing, and other materials are being rapidly rewritten. For another thing there are fewer than ever guides remaining on the Royal Path, especially who speak English. Hopefully this website will be a place where Newcomers to the Faith can keep at least one foot on solid ground, while they are "exploring."

blog owner: Joanna Higginbotham


jurisdiction: ROCA under Vladyka Agafangel

who did not submit to the RocorMP union in 2007


25 July 2014

Using the new calendar as a sign

for judging a jurisdiction

updated 10/11/14

Any church using the new calendar is in world-orthodoxy.  But just because a church uses the old calendar does not mean it is suitable.  Many Churches using the old calendar and calling themselves "true" are schismatic or vagante.

Church unity is not based on common views:
see this excerpt from a 2014 document published by our Greek Sister Church: 

b3. In the end, we need to realize that the True Orthodox Church ought not to cultivate the mistaken impression that Her unity is founded on our view of the Mysteries of the New Calendarists; on the contrary, Her fidelity to Apostolic teaching and Succession should be the focus of Her unity. It is fidelity to our Confession that unites us, and not our view of the Mysteries of the New Calendarists, who are, in any case, fallen away in the Faith and “not in communion [with our Church].”

"Fidelity to Apostolic teaching" can be summarized as "Tradition".  The old calendar is one small part of Tradition.  If any particular group uses the old calendar, this in no way means that they have the whole of the Tradition or that they have Succession.


Another way to say it:

Enlightened Churches do not use the new calendar,
but using the old calendar will not cause an unenlightened Church to be enlightened.

We tend to place too much importance on which calendar a jurisdiction uses as a way to judge that jurisdiction.   We tend to see the new calendar/old calendar as more of a vice/virtue than it is.   The use of the new calendar/old calendar needs to be considered first as a symptom, an indication, a sign.

It is characteristic of world-orthodox jurisdictions to use the new calendar, but not all of them do.  When we see the use of the new calendar we can be certain this jurisdiction is in world-orthodoxy.   But the use of the old calendar is no guarantee that jurisdiction is in any better spiritual condition than a world-orthodox, in fact, it could be worse.   The OCA for example, a world-orthodox jurisdiction, has a number of old calendar parishes in Alaska.   There is a world-orthodox Bulgarian church in Santa Rosa using the old calendar.  The MP and the RocorMP use the old calendar.  Even the vigante Milan synods [AOMNSBI] use the old calendar.   (A Soviet "church" might use the old calendar as part of its disguise, or to help it gain acceptance into groups of old calendarists.)

If you see the old calendar for what it is, which is just a calendar, however superior, then you are less likely to be hoodwinked.  Our own Patriarch Tikhon, in 1924 stated that the Julian calendar itself is not a dogma of faith of the Church and could, in theory and principle, be altered.   The reason we resist the new calendar today is not so much because it is the new calendar, but because of where it came from (antichrist) and it's purpose (ecumenism) and what it caused (schism).

We can judge a Church to be world-orthodox solely by its use of the new calendar,
but we can't judge a Church solely by its use of the old calendar.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Anonymous comments will not be published. I need to know who you are.