WARNING

NOT EVERYTHING THAT

CALLS ITSELF ORTHODOX IS

TRULY ORTHODOX


The above warning was given to me when I first met Orthodoxy in 1986. Today [2009] it is even more perilous, even more difficult to find the Royal Path. For one thing there is a far greater abundance of misinformation. And many materials are missing, and other materials are being rapidly rewritten. For another thing there are fewer than ever guides remaining on the Royal Path, especially who speak English. Hopefully this website will be a place where Newcomers to the Faith can keep at least one foot on solid ground, while they are "exploring."


blog owner: Joanna Higginbotham

joannahigginbotham@gmail.com

jurisdiction: ROCA under Vladyka Agafangel

who did not submit to the RocorMP union in 2007





St. Cyril of Jerusalem: Catechetical Lectures


Orthodox America
SAINT CYRIL OF JERUSALEM CATECHIST AND CONFESSOR
Catechetical Lectures  

With the guarantee of religious tolerance, granted in 313 by Constantine with the Edict of Milan, a new chapter opened in the history of the Church. Along the smoother path more people were attracted to the doors of the Church, spurring its growth and bringing new challenges. Unlike the early Christians, who fully expected their faith to be tried by fire or the sword, these newcomers were not always inspired by burning convictions: a pagan husband might approach the font at the urging of his believing wife, a servant-to curry favor with his believing master; as the practice of infant baptism grew, so did the ranks of younger generations who had not themselves made a conscious profession of faith. To properly initiate these candidates into the mysteries of the Faith was no small task. The difficulty was compounded by troubles brewing within the Church itself. Attacks from without had not yet subsided when, in 318, the Arian heresy erupted. Although it was condemned in 325 by the First Ecumenical Council, it was only towards the end of the century that its proponents were finally forced to cease their divisive maneuverings. It was essential, therefore, that recruits be adequately equipped with sound doctrine and other spiritual armor before they could be expected to conduct themselves as true soldiers of Christ. Among those who shouldered this responsibility, one of the most gifted was St. Cyril of Jerusalem. To this day, his Catechetical Lectures provide a concise course par excellence in the fundamentals of Orthodox doctrine.
For a renowned Church Father, St. Cyril's Life is constructed on surprisingly meager details. According to the Greek Menaion, Cyril was "born of pious parents, professing the orthodox Faith, and to have been bred up in the same, in the reign of Constantine." The year of his birth is generally given as 315 and the location in or around Jerusalem, for it was customary to choose a bishop from among the local clergy, a man already known and respected by the people over whom he would assume spiritual authority. His youth coincided with the height of Arian domination and the rediscovery of the Holy Sepulchre in 326, when Jerusalem, a relatively poor community, began moving into prominence. In 335 Constantine's magnificent Church of the Resurrection was dedicated and Cyril, a new deacon, undoubtedly took part in the ceremonies. The principal celebrants were Arians, who had just deposed their vigorous opponent, St. Athanasius, in a council at Tyre. The Church at Jerusalem, however, never embraced Arianism. Bishop Macarius, and his successor Maximus who ordained Cyril to the priesthood in 345, were both staunchly Nicaean. And when, on Maximus' death in 350, Cyril succeeded him as bishop, he continued to guide the Church at Jerusalem from this position.
Meanwhile, Bishop Acacius of neighboring Caesarea had been drawn into the Arian camp. This conflict between the two hierarchs was sharpened by the resentment Acacius felt when Cyril disputed Caesarea's jurisdiction over Jerusalem, now an established center of pilgrimage and sprouting monastic communities. In 357 Acacius successfully maneuvered to have Cyril deposed. Banished for two years, Cyril went to Tarsus, where he associated with Basil of Ancyra, a champion of Nicaea. There, too, he won the hearts of the people with his preaching. Cyril was banished a second time in 360, returning after the accession of Julian in 361, when all exiled bishops were recalled. Nothing is known of his third period of banishment, from 367 to 378, under the Arian Emperor Valens. In 381 Cyril went to Constantinople as one of 150 Church Fathers who took part in the Second Ecumenical Council. He died peacefully on March 18, 386, remembered by the Church as a great ascetic and uncompromising champion of the true Faith. St. Cyril's principle claim to fame, however, rests on his catechetical lectures. These form a systematic course of instruction which he developed as a priest assigned to prepare candidates for baptism. Essentially practical, highly biblical, direct and noble in tone, they reflect St. Cyril's sincere pastoral concern. Their primary purpose is not to discuss or examine, nor to defend, but to impart knowledge of the Faith. Very striking here is the thoroughness of this preparation and the seriousness with which entry into the Church was regarded. Even before being made catechumens, candidates were strictly examined as to their character, belief and sincerity of purpose. The probationary period varied, lasting about two years.
At the heart of these lectures is a perfectly balanced emphasis on God's transcendence and the ineffable wonder and dignity of the heavenly citizenship conferred through Baptism on the one hand, and man's essential responsibility for genuine repentance and good works on the other. St. Cyril skillfully prepares his listeners in his Introductory Lecture, by turns sobering and exalting, which emphasizes at the outset the need for a sustained purpose. Taken from this lecture, the following passages are characteristic of the Saint's teaching.
§ He lieth not who said, that to them that love God all things work together for good. God is lavish in beneficence, yet He waits for each man's genuine will: therefore the Apostle added and said, to them that are called according to a purpose (Rom. 8:28). The honesty of purpose makes thee called: for if thy body be here but not thy mind, it profiteth thee nothing..
§ Let none of you be found tempting His grace.
§ ...beware lest thou have the title of "faithful" but the will of the faithless. Thou hast entered into a contest, toil on through the race: another such opportunity thou canst not have.
§ Attend closely to the catechisings, and though we should prolong our discourse, let not thy mind be wearied out. For thou art receiving armor against the adverse power, armor against heresies... Thou hast many enemies; take to thee many darts, for thou hast many to hurl them at... And the armor is ready, and most ready the sword of the Spirit; but thou also must stretch forth thy right hand with good resolution, that thou mayest war the Lord's warfare.
§ Great is the Baptism that lies before you: a ransom to captives; a remission of offences; a death of sin; a new-birth of the soul; a garment of light; a holy indissoluble seal; a chariot to heaven; the delight of Paradise; a welcome into the kingdom; the gift of adoption! But there is a serpent by the wayside watching those who pass by: beware lest he bite thee with unbelief...
§ We for our part as men charge and teach you thus: but make not yet our building hay and stubble and chaff, lest we suffer loss, from our work being burnt up: but make ye our work gold and silver, and precious stones! For it lies in me to speak, but in thee to set thy mind upon it, and in God to make perfect.
The first two lectures stress the need for thorough repentance and hope in the remission of sins: "Cleanse thy vessel that thou mayest receive grace more abundantly ...thorny ground also, if cultivated well, is turned fruitful." In the third lecture, "On Baptism", St. Cyril impresses on his audience that "this is no light matter, no ordinary and indiscriminate union according to the flesh, but the All-searching Spirit's election according to faith...Each one of you is about to be presented to God before tens of thousands of the Angelic Hosts: the Holy Spirit is about to seal your souls: ye are to be enrolled in the army of the Great King. Therefore make you ready...that thou mayest become an heir of God, and joint-heir with Christ."
The next lecture provides "a short summary of necessary doctrines," carrying brief statements concerning the Oneness of God, Christ as the Only-begotten Son, His Birth of the Virgin, the Cross, His Burial, Resurrection and Ascension, the Judgment to Come, the Soul ("the noblest work of God"), the Body, Fasting, Baptism, the Scriptures. Following another general lecture, "On Faith," St. Cyril launches into a series of thirteen lectures explaining in greater detail the successive articles of the Jerusalem Creed, which the candidates were required to recite by memory at the time of their baptism.
A second series of five lectures was delivered on Bright Monday to the newly-baptized. Here the Saint initiates them, as it were, into the knowledge of those rites which they have experienced for themselves for the first time, having been strictly required as catechumens to leave the church after the reading of the Gospel and the exclamation, "Catechumens, depart!" The Saint explains to his "true-born" listeners the actual rites of baptism and chrismation, the Eucharist and the Liturgy of the Faithful, with particular attention to the Lord's Prayer. His joy at thus welcoming the new Christians is unmistakable. These five lectures are particularly valuable to us today in documenting the liturgical practices of the early Church, providing stunning evidence of Orthodoxy's ancient liturgical roots. Indeed, it is thrilling to read a fourth-century text that so closely accords with our experience today.
The lectures give one to understand that the course was not limited to candidates for baptism. Those already baptized also came to be edified. Even today, these lectures should be required study for potential converts, while those of us who are already baptized would likewise do well to avail ourselves of these clear streams of living water, to strengthen our faith with knowledge and refresh our sense of awe at the great mystery of our salvation. We owe a great debt to St. Cyril who, through laboring on these lectures, found lasting favor with God and man.
http://www.roca.org/OA/111/111f.htm

The Soul After Death


Because of all the brew-ha-ha about the toll houses, people have forgotten the main purpose of Fr. Seraphim's book The Soul After Death.  The main purpose of this book is to alert Orthodox Christians to the true nature of contemporary "out of body experiences."

Watch this video:

"Man dies, comes back to life, what he saw"-

If you do not clearly recognize this man's experience as demonic, then you need to review this lesson: re-read the book.

The Soul After Death is available from http://www.sjkp.org
Type "soul" into the search box.
$15 includes shipping

If you are experiencing financial hardship, we have a charity fund available, email me and I can get you a free copy.
joannahigginbotham@gmail.com

The Soul After Death is serialized in these issues of The Orthodox Word:
76, 77, 78 , 79, 80, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90

related post:

also see:


In Fr. Seraphim's Defense


The subject of Eugene Rose dabbling with homosexual friendships prior to when he died in Holy Baptism to Christ has been raised on both the Paradosis and Euphrosynos Cafe forums this month.   In Fr. Seraphim's defense we offer this testimony from Reader Daniel who knew Fr. Seraphim and the situation in those days there at Platina quite well.

We do not offer this testimony to those opportunists who grab onto a passed washed-away sin as an excuse to dismiss Fr. Seraphim's priceless presentation of the Holy Fathers' teachings.  Instead, we offer this as a consolation to those who love Fr. Seraphim, who recognize him as God's true shepherd, and who follow him.   –jh 2/25/12


From: Daniel

This remembrance is in regards to a current useless debate, among some, who never personally knew Fr. Seraphim but who only 'know' what others surmise at a distance about... him, about the possible 'homosexuality' of Fr. Seraphim, etc.  It seems too, that the motive of some of these nay-sayers, is to discredit/defame/blacken Fr. Seraphim's person, and his spiritual writings, etc.

And, some of these in the worldly-Orthodox camp, refuse to accept sound Orthodox Patristic teachings.... which is what Fr. Seraphim was all about.  As with the Toll-Houses, as with all that he studied and taught and lived, Fr. Seraphim never taught his own private views, he rather only taught others, what the Holy Fathers preached.

I personally had much contact with both Fr. Seraphim (born Eugene Rose), and more so, with Fr. Herman (born, Gleb Podmoshensky), both in San Francisco a bit before they founded their Platina monastery, and much more so, over a long period of years, up until Fr. Seraphim's passing, when they lived there at their monastery in northern California.

In those days, what I saw in Fr. Seraphim was a very sincere and somewhat severe ascetic, and an intellectual mind, a linguist who could read and pray and translate in many languages, so he didn't understand why everyone couldn't, a man with a very high IQ, and one truly engaging in a daily battle with his flesh (as we all are supposed to do, but few of us really do).

He was entirely dedicated to God and the Church.  Especially, he was on a mission to learn and then share, Patristics, i.e., what the holy Fathers lived and taught.

Surely, his neglect for his body and his own health, were what lead to his early death.  Of that I know.  

I saw absolutely no signs at all, that he led any secret unspiritual life-style, though as it proved to be later on, Fr. Herman ...did.

One example: Someone who participated in a St. Herman Summer retreat, told me later, that when he and Fr. Seraphim walked alone, up the mountain from the monastery, he asked Fr. Seraphim's spiritual advice about his vexing homosexuality, to which Fr. Seraphim responded  .....as a huge rattle snake made it's sudden appearance/rattling near them and ready to strike them, in the brush, "See that snake! ....just as we now must flee that snake, so FLEE homosexuality!" ...as they both ran from the spot...

 (Hardly the words of a practicing homosexual, ...of one who condoned or excused it!)

Fr. Seraphim was always ...denying himself, in all ways ....sleep, hard physical labour, no heat in his tiny cell, etc, etc, etc.... and for monastics especially, that ALSO means, NO sexual excitment or 'activity', EVER, with anyone!

Even the entertainment of such lustful thoughts, is impossible.  And THAT is what Fr. Seraphim practiced.

Anyone and everyone who ever knew him, or was close to him, WITNESSED what I relate here!

It was years later, when I did borrow that book by his non-Orthodox niece, that, "Seraphim Rose, The True Story and Private Letters" by Cathy Scott, that I learned much about his pre-Orthodox, early childhood and life.

Yes, in his early youth, (for whatever reasons ...anyone..... .develops/or may be born with/etc.- whatever sexual attractions to ANYONE of either sex, a very very complicated subject, i.e. human sexuality, etc. ..to say the least), the personal letters in that book do prove that he had such erotic love affairs with some other men.  But, he outgrew that early phase of his life even before his encounter with Orthodoxy, in his Zen phase, when even in that spiritual discipline, pleasures of the flesh were unacceptable, and seen as an obstacle to spiritual advancement.

However, from all that I have known or learned or studied, about Fr. Seraphim, when he entered Orthodoxy, under the spiritual guidance of St. John Maximovitch, (to whom, he must have confessed his previous sins, before baptism), he radically changed completely and started his life long repentance and theosis.

Orthodox Eugene Rose, was a new man, a new creature in Christ.  And, for the monastic  who is dead to this world, in the spiritual realm, it doesn't matter whatsoever!.... what his former physical/sexual attractions were in his old life,  –whether 'heterosexual' or 'homosexual' – he gives it all up for Christ, and to attain the Heavenly Kingdom, to gain that imperishable crown in the New Jerusalem.  His life is one of DISPASSION, and unattachment to things of the body and of this corrupted fallen world.  Fr. Seraphim was such a one.

But one of his heavy burdens, his albatross around his neck, was his weak and passion-filled monastic partner, Gleb (Fr. Herman) Podmoshensky, who from early childhood in chaotic communist-ruled Latvia, (where his father and other family members, died martyric deaths at the hands of the Reds), had a confirmed homosexual self-identity, and... later on, he defended it as some sort of legitimate alternative life-style, (as the militant gays do today), indeed, he even recommended it, i.e. to become monastics, for all Orthodox males, who were 'gay', meaning that: they could still have such sexual relationships, WHILE also being Orthodox monastics, etc.

When Fr. Herman openly said such bizarre things to a group at a St. Herman's Summer Pilgrimage at Platina, citing ....Greek or other indiginous/'native', Orthodox-cultural life, where, he claimed, such things were 'commonly accepted' by the local born-Orthodox rural villagers, Fr. Seraphim left the lecture in obvious and open disgust.

Such a defense, upset Fr. Seraphim greatly!, especially as both of the two, routinely confessed to each other their sins,... plus Fr. Seraphim was no dummy, and he could SEE the overt physical affection that his partner showed to some young male pilgrims to the monastery! (with the excuse of the Russian 3 kisses, etc. and prolonged hugging, all of which monastics, either monks or nuns, should NEVER do!), so Fr. Seraphim HAD to know of his partner's misdeeds, at least with some of them...  which caused him constant grief and sorrow, and shame.

Fr. Herman, however, did most of his ....sexual liaisons outside the monastery, when he was on his... missionary journeys.  At the monastery, he was more careful, especially so with Russian boys from San Francisco, as they might make big trouble for him down there in the Russian community... which did later happen with one young Basil.

But, with converts, Herman was bolder, as he could always claim that, 'What do you expect from crazy-converts!?'  (i.e. they invent fantasies, etc.)

But as a true ascetic, Fr. Seraphim always blamed himself, not others.  The ancient monastic rule is: "To be hard on oneself and easy on others".  Fr. Seraphim always followed that.  Fr. Herman did not.

From what was related to me, by a priest, very close to him, had Fr. Seraphim lived a bit longer than he did, he was planning on leaving Platina and his unrepentant/unstable partner and making or going to a new monastery somewhere else.  I surmise, this being because of Fr. Herman's unrepentant/rebellious secret lifestyle  .....the REAL reason Herman was defrocked (as I was a witness to) by our San Francisco ROCOR Archb. Anthony (Medvedev), though the official public reason was, 'for disobedience', (of which he was indeed guilty of, that's true enough), which was a cover-up, to protect the public image of the church, ...i.e., what bishops do –

Yet, unlike what the Catholic bishops have done or not done in their such cases, on orders from the Holy Synod, our Archb. Anthony DID finally defrock Herman, but with great reluctance and after giving Herman about 2 years or more to repent. Herman has never yet repented, but instead he led Platina into schism.  So, can we find fault, now, with Fr. Seraphim, as by 'guilt by association'? ...i.e., was he co-guilty in the sins of his monastic partner?

I say, NO!

All the evidence that I know of, clearly shows Fr. Seraphim to have been a genuine spiritual giant, a valid model for us all.  However,... he lived his early pre-Orthodox life, he spent the later and end larger Orthodox-Christian part of his life, as a true ascetic and a giant of a heroic Orthodox theologian.

Fr. Seraphim LIVED the theology.

These are a few things, that I KNOW of, not wild and salacious speculation as is coming from some others these days, of, my brief testimony – and which others close to Platina and Fr. Seraphim have shared with me, over the years.

But sadly, for those  few... who are today aware of, or semi-aware of,  Fr. Seraphim's monastic partner's sins and failings, ROCOR defrocked Abbot Herman,... I have seen a pathetic unChristian effort to besmirch and blacken Fr. Seraphim's name too, as if by his closeness to Herman, he too was guilty of the same secret sins of the flesh. 

I KNOW such was not the case!

Fr. Seraphim and Herman Podmoshensky were/are two, VERY different people.  Fr. Seraphim was the true self-abnegating ascetic, and poor Fr. Herman... just playing his own pompous deluded/in prelest, 'Holy Starets' role and his own version of the 'monk', often appointing himself, the spiritual guide of everyone, even when they never requested that of him.
Rd. Daniel Everiss


POSTSCRIPT: The dedicated monastic, gives up ALL physical/erotic/passionate 'attachments' to ANY other human being, no matter what sex they are!

His only love is agapia-love, as he must be above the flesh, not a prisoner of it's lusts.... which separate us from God.  They are eunuchs of God! ...and that is what Fr. Seraphim Rose was, and how he left this world.

Memory Eternal Dear Father Seraphim, and PRAY TO GOD FOR US ALL!  Amen and Amen!



From: Joanna

I remember reading somewhere somebody who knew Fr. Seraphim said that when he was told about some sexual sin, he would say, "That's disgusting" and change the subject.

I've seen where a few have suggested that Fr. Seraphim "struggled" with the homo passion.  Eugene was also a cigarette-smoking heavy-drinking gourmandizer.   Did Fr. Seraphim "struggle" with these passions?  There's no evidence.  All evidence points to that he simply abandoned them.  Homos should follow his example.  Change the subject.

The niece, Cathy Scott, wrote her book immediately after Not of This World was published.  It was suggested that maybe she was trying to get a free ride on the coat-tails of Not of This World.  Out of respect for Fr. Seraphim, I refused to read the book. I don't care if she was a family member: non-Orthodox can not understand an Orthodox soul.  Neither can anyone comprehend the dying that occurs in Orthodox Baptism unless they have experienced it.

You and I know Fr. Seraphim infinitely better than Miss Scott could even imagine.

From where do we think Miss Scott got the idea to write that book?  Judging from all the Orthodox evolutionists who don't want to believe about the toll houses, who use Fr. Seraphim's dead past as an excuse to reject living Patristic teachings; I can well guess from where the idea comes...

∞  ∞  ∞

Orthodox Advices

Website Review

This is the English version of the blog.

Romanian blog owner, Fr. Savatie, appears to be in the MPHis biography is here:

The English selections on the moral topics are sound orthodox teaching, not compromising or misleading, and Fr. Savatie offers some valuable fresh perspective.  But he has the idea that the iron curtain has fallen, and he trusts what is coming out of neo-Mt. Athos.  I think I can recommend the blog with that caveat. 

The articles on abortion, rock music, fasting, angels, horoscopes, and the like are all excellent.

As to the elders, I do not know...  We know that nearing the end of times there will be many false elders appearing.  We know that Mt. Athos is today under the EP.  There is/was a lone hold-out monastery, Esphigmenou, but it has been so severely infiltrated now...  It is safer to stick with the elders we know, such as the Optina elders and  St. Seraphim of Sarov.   I believe the Romanian elder Cleopas is genuine.   But better to skip over the 'elder' who is from neo-Mt. Athos [Ioanichie].   [Definitely don't listen to any "elder" who emphasizes God's "uncreated energies" of which I have not seen mentioned on this website.]

Fr. Savatie's journalism articles, such as "Fatigue and love," are all soundly Orthodox – thoughts shared with us as he might share with friends.

The single article with the idea that Communism has fallen is here:
http://www.sfaturiortodoxe.ro/orthodox/orthodox_advices_hieromonk_savatie_defeated_people.htm
We can't say this is "propaganda."

Another subject, but not unrelated, is the bishop who tonsured Fr. Savatie:  MP bishop Dorimedont.
http://www.orthodoxresearchinstitute.org/hierarchs/russia/former.htm 
   He died in a car wreck in 2006, apparently with some questions surrounding the accident.    The family of the bishop desires to have a copy of the report, but the Head of State keeps stalling in handing it over.  A doctor argues with the family asking them why do they care about the report, anyway, when it can be changed to say anything on the computer?   Not even making a pretense at honesty.  No value in truth is even a mockery to the reposed bishop and his surviving family.
http://www.investigatii.md/eng/index.php?art=164
Scroll down to the fifth entry:

New excuses to hide INN record
A month has passed since the Head of the State stated that Reverend Dorimedont´s relatives would receive a copy of the documents they request, but the INN record is still kept hidden from them. One of the doctors who were involved in this case told us: "What do you want to find in that record? It is so clear that it can be changed in the computer...." Professor Gavriliuc stated that INN would not issue a copy of the record until they see the one from "Lorenz Bohler".

By the Waters of Babylon

Hear melody:
http://stephenhowanetz.tripod.com/Mid%20Files/Great%20Lent%20Mixed%20MIDI/By%20the%20Waters%20of%20Babylon.mid

Read sheet music:
http://stephenhowanetz.tripod.com/PDF%20FILES/Great%20Lent%20Mixed%20PDF/By%20the%20Waters%20of%20Babylon.pdf



By the Waters of Babylon
The Great Fast, Our Exile
by Fr.Seraphim (Rose) March 1965

This weekend, at the Sunday Vigil of the Prodigal Son, we will sing Psalm 135.

[“By the Waters of Babylon” is the entire Psalm 136, sung to a plaintive melody, after the Polyelos Psalm during Matins. It is only sung in church the three Sundays that precede Great Lent, Sunday of the Prodigal Son, The Last Judgment (Meatfare) and Forgivensss (Cheesefare)  It is significant that this same hymn is chanted at the beginning of the service of monastic tonsure. –ed.]

"By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion".

In these words of the Lenten psalm, we Orthodox Christians, the New Israel, remember that we are in exile. For Orthodox Russians, banished from Holy Russia, the Psalm has a special meaning; but all Orthodox Christians, too, live in exile in this world, longing to return to our true home, Heaven.

For us the Great Fast is a session of exile ordained for us by our Mother, the Church, to keep fresh in us the memory of Zion from which we have wandered so far. We have deserved our exile and we have great need of it because of our great sinfulness. Only through the chastisement of exile, which we remember in the fasting, prayer and repentance of this season,

Do we remain mindful of our Zion?

"If I forget thee, O Jerusalem..."

Weak and forgetful, even in the midst of the Great Fast we live as though Jerusalem did not exist for us. We fall in love with the world, our Babylon; we are seduced by the frivolous pastimes of this "strange land" and neglect the services and discipline of the Church which remind us of our true home. Worse yet, we love our very captors - for our sins hold us captive more surely than any human master - and in their service we pass in idleness the precious days of Lent when we should be preparing to meet the Rising Sun of the New Jerusalem, the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.

There is still time; we must remember our true home and weep over the sins which have exiled us from it. Let us take to heart the words of St. John of the Ladder: 
"Exile is separation from everything in order to keep the mind inseparable from God. An exile loves and produces continual weeping." 
Exiled from Paradise, we must become exiled from the world if we hope to return.

This we may do by spending these days in fasting, prayer, separation from the world, attendance at the services of the Church, in tears of repentance, in preparation for the joyful Feast that is to end this time of exile; and by bearing witness to all in this "strange land" of our remembrance of that even greater Feast that shall be when our Lord returns to take His people to the New Jerusalem, from which there shall be no more exile, for it is eternal.